Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)

Anil Phukan vs State Of Assam on 17 March, 1993

In "Anil Phukan vs. State of Assam", 1993 Cri.L.J.1796, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that a conviction can be based on the testimony of single eye-witness and there is no rule of law of evidence which says to the contrary provided that sole witness passes the test of reliability. However, where the single eye- witness is not found to be wholly reliable witness, in the sense that there are some circumstances which may show that he could have any interest in the prosecution then the courts generally insist upon some independent corroboration of his testimony, in material particulars, before recording conviction. It is only when the courts find that the single eye witness is wholly unreliable witness that his testimony is discarded in toto.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 178 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next