Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.24 seconds)
K.C. Kohli vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 1 May, 2006 cites

Jawaharlal Nehru University vs Dr. K.S. Jawatkar & Ors on 12 May, 1989

It was submitted that the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in Balco Employees Union V. Union of India, had distinguished Jawalkar's case (supra) and held that in such instances where the functioning of a department or corporation ended on account of its closure or policies of the Government, there was no inherent right of an employee to be absorbed in other organization.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 379 - R S Pathak - Full Document

Union Of India vs H. C. Goel on 30 August, 1963

14. Counsel contended that the infirmities amounted to the inquiry not being based on any evidence. As a result the findings of the Inquiry Officer were vitiated. He relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court reported as Union of India V. H.C.Goel, , DCM V. Ludh Budh Singh, Page 1839 Central bank of India V. Prakash Chand Jain, Sher Bahadur V. UOI, UOI V. K.A. Kittu, 2001 (1) SCC 651 Laxmi Devi Sugar Millls V. Nand Kishore, Kuldeep Singh V. Comm. of Police .
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 905 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

Central Bank Of India Ltd., New Delhi vs Shri Prakash Chand Jain on 20 August, 1968

14. Counsel contended that the infirmities amounted to the inquiry not being based on any evidence. As a result the findings of the Inquiry Officer were vitiated. He relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court reported as Union of India V. H.C.Goel, , DCM V. Ludh Budh Singh, Page 1839 Central bank of India V. Prakash Chand Jain, Sher Bahadur V. UOI, UOI V. K.A. Kittu, 2001 (1) SCC 651 Laxmi Devi Sugar Millls V. Nand Kishore, Kuldeep Singh V. Comm. of Police .
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 280 - V Bhargava - Full Document

Sher Bahadur vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 August, 2002

14. Counsel contended that the infirmities amounted to the inquiry not being based on any evidence. As a result the findings of the Inquiry Officer were vitiated. He relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court reported as Union of India V. H.C.Goel, , DCM V. Ludh Budh Singh, Page 1839 Central bank of India V. Prakash Chand Jain, Sher Bahadur V. UOI, UOI V. K.A. Kittu, 2001 (1) SCC 651 Laxmi Devi Sugar Millls V. Nand Kishore, Kuldeep Singh V. Comm. of Police .
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 129 - Full Document

Union Of India vs K.A. Kittu And Others on 10 November, 2000

14. Counsel contended that the infirmities amounted to the inquiry not being based on any evidence. As a result the findings of the Inquiry Officer were vitiated. He relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court reported as Union of India V. H.C.Goel, , DCM V. Ludh Budh Singh, Page 1839 Central bank of India V. Prakash Chand Jain, Sher Bahadur V. UOI, UOI V. K.A. Kittu, 2001 (1) SCC 651 Laxmi Devi Sugar Millls V. Nand Kishore, Kuldeep Singh V. Comm. of Police .
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 27 - Full Document

Laxmi Devi Sugar Mills vs Nand Kishore Singh on 4 October, 1956

14. Counsel contended that the infirmities amounted to the inquiry not being based on any evidence. As a result the findings of the Inquiry Officer were vitiated. He relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court reported as Union of India V. H.C.Goel, , DCM V. Ludh Budh Singh, Page 1839 Central bank of India V. Prakash Chand Jain, Sher Bahadur V. UOI, UOI V. K.A. Kittu, 2001 (1) SCC 651 Laxmi Devi Sugar Millls V. Nand Kishore, Kuldeep Singh V. Comm. of Police .
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 18 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document

Balco Employees Union (Regd.) vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 December, 2001

It was submitted that the latest judgment of the Supreme Court in Balco Employees Union V. Union of India, had distinguished Jawalkar's case (supra) and held that in such instances where the functioning of a department or corporation ended on account of its closure or policies of the Government, there was no inherent right of an employee to be absorbed in other organization.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 1192 - Full Document

Sub-Divisional Officer, Konch vs Maharaj Singh on 17 November, 2000

19. Counsel contended that the disciplinary action of removal taken against the petitioner was based on materials gathered during inquiry after proper and fair opportunity was granted to him. 8 witnesses were examined in the inquiry and the Petitioner examined 3 witnesses. The Inquiry Officer in his report considered all the depositions and materials including the admission of the Petitioner in his statement dated 29.6.1976. Therefore, the allegation that the findings of the Petitioner were not based on any evidence are without any basis. Counsel relied upon the judgment of the Sureme Court reported as Sub- Divisional Officer Konch V. Maharaj Singh, .
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 39 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Om Prakash Gupta on 28 October, 1969

22. It was lastly contended that there is no merit in the plea that the statements made during the course of preliminary inquiry should not have been taken into consideration. Counsel contended that the statement was a part of the charge-sheet; at any rate the statement was made by the Petitioner himself. A copy of the statement was furnished to him. He should have refuted its contents or explained them, as the case may be. The Petitioner having in fact replied and referred to the statement, its reliance by the Inquiry Officer to establish some of the charges, could not be characterized as illegal or irregular. Reliance was placed upon the decision reported as State of U.P. V. Om Prakash Gupta, .
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 208 - K S Hegde - Full Document
1   2 3 Next