Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.43 seconds)
Ramesh Kumar vs Managing Director And Another on 2 November, 2017 cites

Uttranchal Forest Development ... vs M.C. Joshi on 23 February, 2007

In Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation v. M.C.Joshi [(2007) 9 SCC 353], the Court was concerned with a daily wager who had worked with Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation from 01.08.1989 to 24.11.1991 and whose services were held to be terminated in violation of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court had directed the reinstatement of the workman with 50 per cent back wages from the date the industrial dispute was raised. Setting aside the order of reinstatement and back wages, this Court awarded compensation in a sum of Rs. 75,000/- in favour of the workman keeping in view the nature and period of service rendered by the workman and the fact that industrial dispute was raised after six years.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 507 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Mahboob Deepak vs Nagar Panchayat Gajraula & Anr on 13 December, 2007

In Mahboob Deepak v. Nagar Panchayat, Gajraula (2008) 1 SCC 575, this Court stated that an order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act may be set aside but an order of reinstatement should not however be automatically passed. The Court observed in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Report as follows (SCC p. 578):
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 361 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next