Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.40 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Govind Raj vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 12 February, 2019
Pawan Kumar vs State Of H.P on 28 April, 2017
"15. Pawan Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh
was a case of elopement which resulted in a criminal
prosecution against the boy, later acquitted on the
girl's testimony in his favour. The boy continued to
harass the girl, holding her responsible for the
criminal proceeding initiated and even threatened to
kidnap her; which proximate threat led to the girl
setting herself ablaze. A dying declaration in the
form of a letter, pinned the responsibility of her
death on the accused. While upholding the (1994) 1
SCC 73 (2017) 7 SCC 780 Criminal Appeal Nos.
2177-85 of 2024 conviction entered into by the High
Court reversing the acquittal by the Trial Court, this
Court held so on the scope of the words 'abetment'
and 'instigate':
Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009
16. Amalendu Pal vs. State of West Bengal 8 also
held:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
S.S.Chheena vs Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr on 12 August, 2010
17. S.S.Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan9
emphasised the requirement of a positive act on the
part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing
suicide. Looking at Section 306, it was held so:
Section 107 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Gopu Ilaiah And Ors. vs The State Of A.P. Rep. By Public ... on 11 October, 2001
(d) Mahendran VS State of Tamil Nadu with Ravi alias
Gopu & Ors vs State represented by the Deputy
Superintendent of Police4