Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)Sri Sri Sri Rajah Rajeswara Gajapathi ... vs Chath Venkataramanayya on 10 October, 1890
5. The learned Advocate-General argues that the Judge in the Court below was right in saying that the agreement referred to in Section 258 is a valid agreement; "but the section itself makes no reference to validity, and Section 257A provides for agreements null and void. We are unable therefore to agree with the construction placed upon Section 258. The case of Gajapati Narayana Devu V. Chath Venkataramanaya, (1890) 1 Mad.
1