Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (1.19 seconds)
Sri. Pavanesh D vs The State Of Karnataka on 19 July, 2023 cites

Brij Mohan Lal vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 May, 2002

The learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani, has also relied on the judgments of this Court in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of in Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad in V. Venkata Prasad v. High Court of A.P. and in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India . We have looked into the judgments referred above by the learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani and the party in person. Having regard to issue involved in the present appeals, we are of the view that the ratio decided in the aforesaid cases would not render any assistance in support of their claim in these cases. The claim of seniority will depend upon 88 several factors, nature of appointment, rules as per which the appointments are made and when appointments are made, were such appointments to the cadre posts or not, etc. When the appellants were not appointed to any regular posts in the A.P. Judicial Service, the appellants cannot claim seniority based on their ad hoc appointments to preside over Fast Track Courts. We are of the view that the ratio decided in the said judgments relied on by the appellants would not render any assistance in support of their case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 246 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Debabrata Dash & Anr vs Jatindra Prasad Das & Ors on 11 March, 2013

The learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani, has also relied on the judgments of this Court in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of in Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad in V. Venkata Prasad v. High Court of A.P. and in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India . We have looked into the judgments referred above by the learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani and the party in person. Having regard to issue involved in the present appeals, we are of the view that the ratio decided in the aforesaid cases would not render any assistance in support of their claim in these cases. The claim of seniority will depend upon 88 several factors, nature of appointment, rules as per which the appointments are made and when appointments are made, were such appointments to the cadre posts or not, etc. When the appellants were not appointed to any regular posts in the A.P. Judicial Service, the appellants cannot claim seniority based on their ad hoc appointments to preside over Fast Track Courts. We are of the view that the ratio decided in the said judgments relied on by the appellants would not render any assistance in support of their case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 22 - R M Lodha - Full Document

V. Venkata Prasad & Ors vs High Court Of A.P. & Ors on 29 June, 2016

The learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani, has also relied on the judgments of this Court in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of in Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad in V. Venkata Prasad v. High Court of A.P. and in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India . We have looked into the judgments referred above by the learned Senior Counsel Sri Venkataramani and the party in person. Having regard to issue involved in the present appeals, we are of the view that the ratio decided in the aforesaid cases would not render any assistance in support of their claim in these cases. The claim of seniority will depend upon 88 several factors, nature of appointment, rules as per which the appointments are made and when appointments are made, were such appointments to the cadre posts or not, etc. When the appellants were not appointed to any regular posts in the A.P. Judicial Service, the appellants cannot claim seniority based on their ad hoc appointments to preside over Fast Track Courts. We are of the view that the ratio decided in the said judgments relied on by the appellants would not render any assistance in support of their case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 9 - D Misra - Full Document

State Of Bihar And Others Etc vs Akhouri Sachindra Nath And Others Etc on 19 April, 1991

"31. This Court in Vinodanand Yadav v. State of Bihar held on an issue regarding the inter se seniority among the direct recruits and promotees the Court applying the ratio of State of Bihar v. Akhouri Sachindra Nath held that the appellants who were direct recruits shall be considered senior over the promotees not borne on the cadre when the direct recruits were appointed in service. Hence the gradation list drawn under which promotees were given seniority over direct recruits could not be sustained and was thereby set aside."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 119 - B C Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next