Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.32 seconds)Panchanan Mondal And Others vs West Bengal Board Of Secondary ... on 1 February, 1996
MA 351/00704/2020 arising out of OA 351/01385/2020 (Deepa Mondal &
Ors. vs. Education), stands as disposed of as per para 4 of this order.
Joginder Pal & Ors. Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 23 May, 2014
(b) That, the observations made in Sachin Kumar (supra) echo those made in
Joginder Pal v. State of Punjab reported in (2014) 6 SCC 644, wherein the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, referring to its own judgment in Inderpreet Singh
Kahlon v. State of Punjab reported in (2006) 11 SCC 356, extracted the following
principles :- hy
"~
23 0A 351/95/2019, OA 351/120/2019, OA 351/1385/2020 & OA 351/1570/2019
© " (a)...
Inderpreet Singh Kahlon & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 3 May, 2006
(b) That, the observations made in Sachin Kumar (supra) echo those made in
Joginder Pal v. State of Punjab reported in (2014) 6 SCC 644, wherein the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, referring to its own judgment in Inderpreet Singh
Kahlon v. State of Punjab reported in (2006) 11 SCC 356, extracted the following
principles :- hy
"~
23 0A 351/95/2019, OA 351/120/2019, OA 351/1385/2020 & OA 351/1570/2019
© " (a)...
Kumari Anamica Mishra And Anr. Etc. Etc vs U.P. Public Service ... on 9 November, 1989
(c) Further reference is placed on the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in
Anamica Mishra v. Public Service Commission, Allahabad reported in (1990)
Supp.
A.P.Aggarwal vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi And Another on 16 November, 1999
Learned Counsel would refer to the settled principle that a candidate on the
provisionally select list does not acquire a vested right to be appointed and that
he has no reason to be aggrieved if the recruiting authority cancels the select list
and resorts to a fresh selection process to state that the said assertion is often
opposed to the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in A.P. Aggarwal v.
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi reported in (2000) 1 SCC 600, wherein it as held as
follows :-
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi Etc. Etc vs State Of U.P. And Ors on 20 September, 1990
26 0A 351/95/2019, OA 351/120/2019, OA 351/1385/2020 & OA 351/1570/2019
basic to the rule of law, the system which governs us. (vide Shrilekha Vidyarthi
versus State.of U.P. (1991) 1 SCC 212)."
The State Of Jharkhand vs Brahmputra Metallics Limited on 1 December, 2020
Learned Counsel for the applicant would further rely on the doctrine of
legitimate expectations to refer to the judgement in State of Jharkhand v.
Brahmputra Metallics Ltd. reported in 2020 SCC Online SC 968.
Noida Entrepreneurs Assn vs Noida & Ors on 15 January, 2007
The Hon'ble
Supreme Court had elaborated on the doctrine of legitimate expectations, while
referring to its own decision in NOIDA Entrepreneurs Assn. v. NOIDA, reported in
(2011) 6 SCC 508, to come to the following conclusion :-
Dinu Kumar Pandey vs The Union Of India And Ors on 18 April, 2016
Those challenging the selection process as the applicants in OA
351/217/2019 (Sumonta Das & ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.}, OA
351/00023/2019 (Rinu Kumari Pandey vs. Union of India & Ors.), O.A. No.
351/01919/2018 (Smt. Tafsana Tabsum & 02 ors. v. Union of India & ors.), O.A.
No. 351/01920/2018 (Shri B. Dhilli Rao & 03 ors. v. Union of India & ors.), O.A.
No. 351/01923/2018 (Smt. Susnigdha Mondal & 03 ors. v. Union of india & ors.)
and O.A. No. 351/01925/2018 (Smt. Uma Rani Roy & 03 ors. v. Union of India &
ors.) also felt frustrated, as despite better academic results, they failed to qualify
as they had responded differently in their self-assessment on medium of
instructions.