Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.36 seconds)K. Krishna Murthy & Ors vs Union Of India & Anr on 11 May, 2010
14. It appears on a reading of the said expostulation of law
that in the making of reservation(s) of the backward class category
of candidates for the municipal bodies concerned, there was breach
of the quantitative ceiling limit of 50 % reservation vis-a-vis SCs,
STs and OBCs, inasmuch as, the backward class reservation
becoming included with the said limit. Moreover, it also appears
that the supra expostulation of law was made on the ground that the
triple test supra as indicated in K. Krishna Murthy's case (supra)
became not satiated.
Vikas Kishanrao Gawali vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 March, 2021
(ii) The triple test laid down in the case of Vikas Kishan
Rao Gawali (supra) and in the case of Suresh Mahajan (supra) has
not been fulfilled and thus, no backward class reservation could be
provided.
Suresh Mahajan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 May, 2022
(ii) The triple test laid down in the case of Vikas Kishan
Rao Gawali (supra) and in the case of Suresh Mahajan (supra) has
not been fulfilled and thus, no backward class reservation could be
provided.
Article 243U in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 [Entire Act]
Punjab Municipal Act, 1911
Article 243D in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Vaibhav Pandey vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. ... on 27 December, 2022
In sequel, on the said
inter-se distinctive facts in Vaibhav Pandey's case (supra) thus with
12 of 20
::: Downloaded on - 28-12-2024 04:39:59 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:170466-DB
CWP-256-2023 and connected cases -13-
the facts at hand, therefores, the said verdict is not applicable to the
instant case.