Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.12 seconds)Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mano Dutt & Anr vs State Of U.P on 29 February, 2012
13. Even in the incident Fandulal (PW/4) also sustained injury,
which shows that this witness is present on the spot at the time of
incident. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mano Dutt & Another Vs.
State of U.P, (2012) 4 SCC 79 held that "the injury to the witness is an
inbuilt guarantee of his presence at the scene of the crime and because
the witness will not want to let his actual assailant go unpunished merely
to falsely implicate a third party for the commission of the offence.
Thus, the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless
there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of
major contradictions and discrepancies therein." There are no major
contradictions and discrepancies in the statement of Fandulal (PW/4) on
the point that in the incident appellant inflicted injury in the stomach of
Guladar by ballam. So there is no reason to disbelieve his statement up
to this extent which is also supported by the statement of other witnesses
also as discussed above.
Sanjay Dutt vs State Of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,Bombay on 21 March, 2013
In the case of
Sanjay Vs. State, 2001 Cr. L.J. 1231 (SC) held that " It is well settled
that evidence of search or seizure made by the police will not be vitiated
solely for the reason that independent witnesses do not support the
evidence.