Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (1.18 seconds)Section 44 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
Raj Lakshmi Dasi And Others vs Banamali Sen And Othersbholanath Sen ... on 27 October, 1952
observed the Supreme Court in -- 'Raj Lalishmi Dasi v. Banamali Sen (B) (ante)',
"is one of the limitations engrafted on the general rule of res judicata by Section 11 of the Code and has application to suits alone."
Section 16 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Fateh Singh vs Jagannath Baksh Singh on 17 November, 1924
In most of the decisions of the Judicial Committee, their Lordships, after coming to the conclusion that a particular matter was constructively in issue in the prior suit, proceeded to hold that it was 'res judicata' without further discussion, but the words "heard and finally decided" were specifically referred to and considered in -- 'Fateh Singh v. Jagannath Baksh' .