Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd vs Regency Convention Centra & Hotels & Ors on 6 July, 2010
In Mumbai
International Airport (supra), the Supreme Court has explained the
distinction, thus: -
Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 4 March, 1992
In Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal vs.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. (1992) 2 SCC 524,
the Supreme Court held that a person cannot be impleaded as a party
only on the basis that it has relevant evidence. The Court has
formulated the test, thus: -
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 22 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt Ltd vs Anup Mittal & Ors. on 14 May, 2015
In
Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Anup Mittal & Ors. 2015 (220)
DLT 436, this Court reiterated the principles laid down by the Court
of the Judicial Commissioner, Goa, Daman and Diu in Gonsalo De
Filomena Luis vs. Inacio Piedade Hildeberte Fernandes & Ors. AIR
1977 GDD 4. The said judgment deals with a case where parties were
sought to be added to the suit without any relief being claimed against
them. Therefore, it is also not applicable to the present case when the
plaintiff has sought relief against the defendants seeking deletion, in
addition to the other defendants.
1