Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)

Dhirajlal Girdharilal vs C.I.T. Bombay on 25 October, 1954

We must read the order of the Tribunal as a whole to determine whether every material fact, for and against the assessee, has been considered fairly and with the due care; whether the evidence pro and con has been considered in reaching the final conclusion ; and whether the conclusion reached by the Tribunal has been coloured by irrelevant considerations or matters of prejudice. Learned Counsel for the appellant has taken us through the entire order of the Tribunal as also the relevant materials on which it is based. Having examined the order of the Tribunal and those materials, we are unable to agree with learned Counsel for the appellant that the order of the Tribunal is vitiated by any of the defects adverted to in Dhirajlal Girdharilal v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay (1) or Omar Salay Mohamed Sait v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras(2). We must make (1) (1954) 26 I.T.R. 736.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 203 - M C Mahajan - Full Document

Omar Salay Mohamed Sait vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras on 5 March, 1959

We must read the order of the Tribunal as a whole to determine whether every material fact, for and against the assessee, has been considered fairly and with the due care; whether the evidence pro and con has been considered in reaching the final conclusion ; and whether the conclusion reached by the Tribunal has been coloured by irrelevant considerations or matters of prejudice. Learned Counsel for the appellant has taken us through the entire order of the Tribunal as also the relevant materials on which it is based. Having examined the order of the Tribunal and those materials, we are unable to agree with learned Counsel for the appellant that the order of the Tribunal is vitiated by any of the defects adverted to in Dhirajlal Girdharilal v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay (1) or Omar Salay Mohamed Sait v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras(2). We must make (1) (1954) 26 I.T.R. 736.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 278 - Full Document
1