Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.31 seconds)Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977
Section 10 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Rachamalla Sridhar Murali Krishna, S/O ... vs The State Of A.P., Reptd By Its Principal ... on 29 January, 2016
Further, the second ground with regard to non-
availability of the original assignment is also not concerned with
the petitioner. It is for the authorities to safeguard their records.
If the records are not available that does not mean that the
petitioner‟s property ought to be included in prohibitory list notified
6
DR, J
W.P.No.26000 of 2024
under Section 22-A of the Act and when the respondents are not
denying with regard to the orders passed by the then Revenue
Divisional Officer on 15.06.2010, the question of non-availability
of the records does not arise. To substantiate his contention,
learned counsel has relied on the orders passed by this Court in
K.Sridhar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its
Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue in W.P.No.28882
of 2022, wherein an identical issue has been considered by this
Court and held at paragraph No.18 as follows:
Ande Narasimha Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. By Its ... on 21 December, 2012
"18. Further the case of the petitioner was rejected on
the ground that there is no entry in DKT register maintained
by the concerned Tahsildar. Further the 2nd respondent
completely ignored the factum of issuance of pattadar pass
books and title deeds in favour of the petitioner and his
vendor. On a close perusal of counter affidavit filed in the
present writ petition, it is clear that the respondent did not
deny the issuance of DKT patta in favour of Sri K.C.Naga
Raju. Further, by stating that the DKT register does not
contain the entry showing that DKT patta was issued in
favour of original assignee Sri K.C.Naga Raju, the
respondents did not put forth anything to substantiate the
same. Merely because the DKT patta register does not
contain entry, the same cannot be put against the
petitioner. Further making entry in the DKT register is
exclusively within the domain of the concerned Tahsildar
7
DR, J
W.P.No.26000 of 2024
and it is only a Ministerial act. The counsel for petitioner
places reliance on Judgment in the case of "Ande
Narasimha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and
others"1 in support of his contention. In the said Judgment
this Court held as under:
1