Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)
A.Pandi Selvi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 23 January, 2020 cites

V. Premanand vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others on 27 April, 1995

The Division Bench allowed batch of cases, relying on the earlier Division Bench order reported in (1995) 2 MLJ 325 (V.Premanand v. State of Tamil Nadu), wherein it was held that 'as long as it is not in dispute that the petitioner belongs to the category of 'children born of inter-caste marriage between SC/ST and forward community', and he was able to produce the certificate before the application was scrutinised for admission, the rejection on the ground that certificate was not enclosed is only a procedural lapse and production of certificate is only a piece of evidence'.
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

Dolly Chhanda vs Chairman, Jee & Ors on 5 October, 2004

12. The Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2005) 9 SCC 779 (Dolly Chhanda v. Chairman, Jee) considered similar issue and in paragraph 7 held thus, "7. The general rule is that while applying for any course of study or a post, a person must possess the eligibility qualification on the last date fixed for such purpose either in the admission brochure or in application form, as the case may be, unless there is an express provision to the contrary. There can be no relaxation in this regard i.e., in the matter of holding the requisite eligibility qualification by the date fixed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 362 - Full Document

Dr. A. Rajapandian vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 7 November, 2006

'11. The issue as to enclosing the certificate for selection in a particular category is directory or mandatory, came up before this Court in the decision reported in (2007) 1 MLJ 820 (Dr.A.Rajapandian v. State of Tamil Nadu). In the said decision the registration certificate of Veterinary Assistant Surgeons was not enclosed by some candidates, 5/12 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD) No.25427 of 2019 who applied for selection to the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeons.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Charles. K. Skaria vs Dr.C.Mathew on 19 March, 1980

The said decision was rendered by following an earlier decision reported in (1980) 2 SCC 752 (Charles K.Skaria v. Dr.C.Mathew). Similar contention raised in the said decision by the unsuccessful candidates seeking to quash the selection of candidates, who have not enclosed the certificates for the award of extra mark was considered in paragraphs 20 and 24, which read thus,
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 230 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1