Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)Dr A V Koteswara Rao vs Gnctd on 9 February, 2022
13 OA 352/00130/SKM/2020
Resignation on or after 2004 can be claimed or extended the benefit of
previous service. In the present case, undisputedly, the applicant after
his retirement or upon completion of his service period in the year 2013
from Military Establishment had joined the MSME on 26.12.2015.
Therefore, the benefit of Rule 19 is available to the applicant herein
since his re-employment is in MSME was on or after 2004.
6.3. It is submitted that while rejecting the claim of the applicant, the
respondents had considered the order passed by the CAT, Principal
Bench in O.A. No. 3162/2015 in the case of A.V. Koteswar Rao vs. Govt.
of NCT, New Delhi & ors. along with O.A. No. 3160/2015 (Suresh Kumar
Bukka v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and had recorded the finding that in the
said referred cases, the said Mr. Rao was extended the benefit of Rule 19
since his resignation from Military Service was considered to be
Technical Resignation under the provision of Rule 26(2) and,
accordingly, he was found eligible for counting of his past Military
Service in the said Rule 26(2) but not under Rule 19 of CCS (Pension)
Rules. The present case is, therefore, not covered under O.M. dated
28.10.2009 and Rule 19 is also not applicable in this case. Accordingly,
vide impugned order dated 11.12.2019, the claim of the applicant has
not been acceded to, which is just and proper.
Koteshwar Rao vs State, Gnct Of Delhi & Anr on 23 April, 2021
And
O.A. No. 3162/2015 titled as A.V. Koteshwar Rao vs. Govt.
of NCT of Delhi & Ors. are identical, they are being
disposed of by the Hon'ble Central Administrative
Tribunal, principal Bench, New Delhi by common order
dated 13.02.2017.
1