Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.54 seconds)The Public Prosecutor vs R. Karuppian on 19 September, 1957
In The Public Prosecutor v. R. Karuppian A.I.R. [1058] Mad. 183., Somasundaram, J., while dealing with a case arising under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (Section 17(1)) observed that the Secretary of the Co-operative Milk Society, on the facts of the case, could not be held to be a person in charge of the Society. On the facts of that case the business of selling milk was done by the clerk of the Society and the Secretary was only an honorary Secretary and was not coming to the Society daily.
Section 27 in The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The State vs S.P. Bhadani And Ors. on 11 April, 1958
In State v. S.P. Bhadani . Kanhaiya Singh, J., in construing a similar provision of the Employees Provident Fund Act (1952). Section 14A-held that the first Sub-section would be confined only to officers in the immediate charge of the management of the company. Later he observed that "it is, therefore, manifest that all the officers of the company not in direct charge of the management of the business are immune from the liability for the offence, unless they have contributed to its commission by consent, connivance or neglect."
The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Section 342 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
1