Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)

Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Bombay vs Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay ... on 24 April, 1992

18) We may mention at the outset that there cannot be any dispute to the proposition that Section 80P of the Act is a benevolent provision which is enacted by the Parliament in order to encourage and promote growth of co-operative sector in the economic life of the country. It was done pursuant to declared policy of the Government. Therefore, such a provision has to be read liberally, reasonably and in favor of the assessee (See - Bajaj Tempo Limited, Bombay v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City-III, Bombay3).
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 590 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay And ... vs Mahindra And Mahindra Limited & Ors on 2 September, 1983

It is also trite that such a provision has to be construed as to effectuate the object of the Legislature and not to defeat it (See - Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay & Ors. v. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited & Ors.4). Therefore, it hardly needs to be emphasized that all those co-operative societies which fall within the purview of Section 80P of the Act are entitled to deduction in respect of any income referred to in sub-section (2) thereof. Clause
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 304 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document

Sikar Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd., ... vs Ito, Sikar on 29 August, 2017

Considering the view taken by Hon'ble Apex Court on the extent of applicability Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, on a Co-operative Society providing credit facilities to its members, the decision of Jaipur Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jalwar Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd (supra) relied on by the ld. Authorised Representative, in my opinion pales into insignificance.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 Next