Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)Pesala Nookaraju vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh on 16 August, 2023
3. This Court cannot grant any indulgence on
the first three grounds based on the decision in W.P.H.C.
No.100003/2014 because of the decision in Pesala
Nookaraju vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and
others [supra]. As regards the reliance on the decision of the
Apex Court in Ameena Begaum, this Court must opine that
there are no pleadings if the petitioners cannot succeed on
2 [2023] 14 SCC 641
3
(2015) 13 SCC 722
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2311-DB
WP No. 100146 of 2025
the first three grounds in the light of the Apex Court's later
decision in Pesala Nookaraju, he must be at liberty to
question the merits of the confirmation order dated
12.12.2024 in view the exposition in Ameena Begaum. In
the light of the afore, the petition stands disposed of with
liberty to the petitioner, subject to all just exceptions
including the observation that the petitioner will not be
entitled to urge the first three grounds that are considered.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ameena Begum vs The State Of Telangana on 4 September, 2023
Sri. S.S. Yadrami also proposes to engage this Court on the
merits of the State Government's order dated 12.12.2024 in
view of the exposition by the Apex Court in Ameena Begum
vs. State of Telangana and others1.
Cherukuri Mani vs Chief Secr.,Govt.Of A.P.& Ors on 8 May, 2014
2. Sri. G.K. Hiregoudar, the learned Principal
Government Advocate, submits that there cannot be any
interference either on the first two grounds or on the third
ground in view of the fact that the Apex Court in Pesala
Nookaraju vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and
1 [2023] 9 SCC 587
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2311-DB
WP No. 100146 of 2025
others2 has declared that its earlier decision in Cherukuri
Mani v. Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra
Pradesh3 does not lay down the correct law and that the
decision of the Division Bench in W.P.H.C. No.100003/2014
is only because of the proposition in Cherukuli Mani. Sri.
G.K. Hiregoudar further states that the representation by
the petitioner's wife has been considered before the grant of
approval for the detention order as contemplated under
Goonda Act and after the approval order dated 02.12.2024,
the learned counsel submits that the petitioner's wife is
issued with Endorsement in these regards on 15.11.2024.
1