Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.26 seconds)

Mohammad Faruk Warasi vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Another on 8 July, 2016

7. Learned Senior Counsel argued that it was incumbent upon the learned Court below to deal with the objection raised by the petitioner and the learned Court below without assigning any proper reason much less without dealing with the objection of the petitioner admitted Misc. Case No. 12 of 2019 in complete disregard of the provisions laid down under Section 34 (3) of the 1996 Act. He relies upon the judgment of this Court, in the case of Geeta Devi and Another v. the State of Bihar, reported in 2001 (1) PLJR 647, in which the learned Single Judge, relying upon the case of Gulab Chand Jain v. State, reported in 1980 BLJR 156, has held that the court must assign the reason for its satisfaction while condoning the delay.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sarguja Transport Service vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, ... on 12 November, 1986

The Supreme Court rejected the contention of the Union of India and held that the second application is maintainable and distinguished the case of Sarguja Transport Service (supra), holding that the action of the management of withdrawal of the first application was bona fide and the same was not a case of bench-hunting with a view to avoid adverse order likely to be passed against it. It was also observed, in Sarva Shramik Sanghatana (KV) (supra),that the provision of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 did not strictly apply to industrial adjudication and the second application was held to be maintainable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 523 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document
1   2 Next