Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.59 seconds)Harish Chandra Tewari, Son Of Sri Gaya ... vs The State Of U.P. Through The Secretary ... on 15 December, 2003
The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 13.3.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act ,Court No.4, Gorakhpur in Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2020 (Harsh Tiwari @ Harish Tiwari Vs. State of U.P.), arising out of order dated 23.1.2020 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gorakhpur in Case Crime No. 150 of 2019 , under Sections- 323, 328, 342, 363, 366, 376, 120-B I.P.C.,3/4, 16/17 POCSO Act and 3(2) (5) of S.C./S.T. Act Police Station- Belipur , District- Gorakhpur .
Sadhu Saran Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 26 February, 2016
Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB). It has been consistently followed in subsequent decisions of this court.
Section 229A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
1