Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.20 seconds)Section 6 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India & Ors vs M/S. Asian Food Industries on 7 November, 2006
23. A bare reading of the provisions of Section 5 of the Act indicates that
a policy cannot be made with retrospective effect. The expression
'formulate and announce' used in Section 5 clearly means that the power is
to be exercised prospectively. The Supreme Court in Union of India v.
Asian Food Industries: (2006) 13 SCC 542 held as under:-
The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992
Section 3 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 10 March, 2006
In the case of Mahabir Vegetables Oils (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. State of
Haryana & Ors.: (2006) 3 SCC 620, the Supreme Court had held as
under:-
M/S. Noble Resources And Trading vs Union Of India And Others on 7 October, 2011
26. A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Noble Resources
and Trading India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India: 2012 (276) ELT 3 (Bom.)
examined the challenge to a notification dated 31.03.2011 issued by DGFT
whereby schedule of rates under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB)
Scheme was amended to disentitle export of cotton with respect to
shipments made on or after 21.04.2010. The circular explained the
amendment as under:-
1