Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)National Insurance Company Ltd vs Annappa Irappa Nesaria & Ors on 22 January, 2008
No doubt, in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd.
v. Annappa Irappa Nesaria, reported in 2008 ACJ 721 (SC),
the date of the accident was 9.12.1999, i.e, prior to the
amendment, whereas, in the present case, the accident is of
the year, 2003. However, the fact remains that neither the
license of the present appellant was cancelled nor the
amendment provides that the license issued earlier shall
stand cancelled or that the citizen should apply for fresh
driving license in view of the amendment. Thus, while
applying the amendment, it is the date of license which is
required to be taken into consideration.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004
Hon'ble the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd.
v. Swaran Singh & Others (Supra) recorded summary of the
findings in clause (vi) of para 109, which runs as under :-
Section 3 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Gold (Control) Act, 1968
Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs Roshanben Rahemansha Fakir & Anr on 12 May, 2008
With reference to the second argument of the learned
counsel for the appellant that it is the date of the accident
which is to be taken into consideration while applying the
amendment, was considered by the Apex Court in the case
of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Roshanben Rahemansha
Fakir and another, reported in 2008 Vol.IV ACJ 2161. Para
14 of the said judgment reads as under :-
1