Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (1.02 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shyam Babu Verma And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 8 February, 1994
Yet again in Shyam Babu Verma (supra), N.P. Singh, J.
speaking for a three-Judge Bench observed :
Col. A. S. Iyer & Ors. Etc vs V. Balasubramanyam & Ors on 24 October, 1979
The aforementioned decisions are authorities for the
proposition that despite the fact that the employees have
been performing similar duties and functions and their posts
are interchangeable, a valid classification can be made on
the basis of their educational qualification. The
observation of Krishna Iyer, J. in V. Balasubramanyam
(supra) although is interesting but it appears that the fact
of the matter involved therein did not warrant application
of the said principle.
State Of Mysore & Anr vs P. Narasing Rao on 31 August, 1967
Furthermore, as noticed hereinbefore, a valid
classification based on educational qualification for the
purpose of grant of pay has been upheld by the Constitution
Bench of this Court in P. Narasinga Rao (supra).
Mewa Ram Kanojia vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 9 March, 1989
In fact one of them, K.N. Singh, J., as the learned
Chief Justice then was, was a party to the subsequent
decision in Mewa Ram Kanojia (supra). In that case no
material was brought on records on the basis of which it
could be contended that there was any substantial difference
at that time between the two classifications although they
were described differently. It was in that situation
observed :
Union Of India & Anr vs P.V.Hariharan & Anr on 12 March, 1997
The principle was reiterated in V. Markendeya (supra),
observing :
Saurabh Chaudri & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 4 November, 2003
Article 14 forbids class legislation but permits
reasonable classification subject to the conditions that it
is based on an intelligible differentia and that the
differentia must have a rational relation to the object
sought to be achieved. [See Saurabh Chaudri and Ors. Vs.
Union of India and Ors. [2003 (9) SCALE 272]
Constitutional interpretation is a difficult task.
Its concept varies from statute to statute, fact to fact,
situation to situation and subject matter to subject matter.
Lachhman Das On Behalf Of Firmtilak Ram ... vs State Of Punjab And Others[And ... on 23 April, 1962
The view of Subba Rao, J. in Lachhman Dass vs. State of
Punjab and Others [AIR 1963 SC 222] was a minority view.
Venkatarama Aiyar, J. therein speaking for the majority
held :