Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)

K. Ramadas Shenoy vs The Chief Officers, Town Municipal ... on 9 August, 1974

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 256 - A N Ray - Full Document

Dr. G.N. Khajuria & Ors vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors on 31 August, 1995

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 156 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd vs Radhey Shyam Sahu And Others on 26 July, 1999

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 77 - Cited by 432 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Friends Colony Development Committee vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 November, 2004

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 318 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 1765 - H K Sema - Full Document

S.N. Chandrashekar And Anr vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 2 February, 2006

They suffer from skin diseases of different types, asthma, allergies and even more dreaded diseases like cancer. It can only be a matter of imagination how much the Government has to spend on the treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorised constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws and emphasised that no compromise should be made with the town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator of the town planning scheme, etc. on the ground that he has spent substantial amount on construction of the buildings, etc.-- K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Town Municipal Council, Udipi, G.N. Khajuria (Dr.) v. DDA, M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, Friends Colony Development Committee v. State of Orissa, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 82 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Jansukh Apartment Co Operative Housing ... vs The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Of ... on 11 April, 2023

25. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court echoing the view that the unauthorized and illegal constructions do not advance the aim of the State to ensure planned development, in Esha Ekta kta Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and others 4 had rejected the case for directing the respondents to regularize the construction made in violation of sanctioned plan, observed as under:
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - S G Dige - Full Document
1   2 Next