Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)

State Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004

27. Learned counsel for the complainant in his arguments relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bharat Parikh vs. C.B.I. and Crl.RP.No.744/2018 C/w Crl.RP.No.669/2017 35 Ors. reported in MANU/SC/7850/2008 wherein, the Hon'ble Apex Court after referring to its previous judgment in the case of State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi reported in AIR 2005 SC 359, was pleased to observe that at the stage of framing charge roving and fishing inquiry is impermissible and a mini trial cannot be conducted at such stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 1174 - Full Document

Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar vs State Of M.P on 1 May, 2002

With great respect to the said judgment, it is submitted that in the very same judgment, the Hon'ble Apex Court has also observed that none else than the wife of deceased was shown to have stated that the deceased always remained in a drunken condition. Thus, the Hon'ble Apex Court was also pleased to hold that it is common knowledge that Crl.RP.No.744/2018 C/w Crl.RP.No.669/2017 24 excessive drinking leads one to debauchery. It clearly appeared, therefore, that the deceased was a victim of his own conduct unconnected with the quarrel that had ensued on 25-7-1998, where the appellant was stated to have used abusive language. With the said observation, taking the totality of materials on record and facts and circumstances of case into consideration, Hon'ble Apex Court was pleased to hold that it was deceased and he alone, and none else, was responsible for his death.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 1297 - Full Document
1   2 Next