Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.52 seconds)V.Devan vs The Tahsildar on 22 December, 2020
In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No.
15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
9/12
WP No.18333 of 2021
this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying
the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the
ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even
inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy
Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the
respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and
have been rejecting such applications.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
R.Lokesh Kannan vs The District Collector on 21 June, 2017
6.In view of the above facts, this writ petition is disposed
of directing the petitioner to submit a fresh application to the
second respondent enclosing this order copy and the orders
passed in the writ petition referred above, within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
The Registration Of Births And Deaths Act, 1969
1