Kristo Chunder Ghose And Ors. vs Raj Kristo Bandyopadhya And Ors. on 8 July, 1885
In a large number of cases decided in this Court, for instance in the cases Kristo Bulluv Ghose v. Kristo Lal Singh 16 C. 642 ; 8 Ind. Dec. (N.S.)
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Chintamoni Dutt vs Rash Behari Mondul on 10 July, 1891
424; Chintamoni Butt v. Bash Behari Mondul 19 C. 17 ; 9 Ind. Dec. (N.S.)
Section 5 in Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 [Entire Act]
Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885
Rup Chand Ghose vs Narendra Krishna Ghose on 28 May, 1914
457 and Rup Chand v. Narendra 28 Ind. Cas. 683 ; 19 C.W.M. 112 it has been held that where the provisions of Section 12 of the Act have been complied with, the transferor of a permanent tenure ceases to be liable for subsequent rent. In this case the transfer took place in December 1903 and was well known to the landlord, who after the transfer and before the present suit has brought three successive rent suits against the transferees. On the authority of the cases cited I am, therefore, of opinion that the Mukherjees have long ceased to be liable for the rent of Tajpur and that the charge or mortgage on Sandhya has been extinguished.
1