Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)Section 630 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Atul Mathur, Divisional Sales Manager ... vs Atul Kalra And Anr on 8 August, 1989
In the above paragraph, the learned single Judge of this Court would specifically refer about the decision of the Supreme Court in Atul Mathur v. Atul Kalra , wherein it is held that merely because the accused had schemingly filed a suit in civil court, it can never be said that
the civil court was in seisin of a bona fide dispute between the parties and as such, the Criminal Court should have stayed its hands when the Company filed a complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act. Thus, it is clear that the point urged before this Court has already been dealt with by this Court as early as 12-5-1999.
Section 362 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Rajendra Singh & Ors on 14 March, 2000
In order to substantiate his plea, the counsel for the petitioner would refer the authorities in V.M. Shah v. State of Maharasthra , United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajendra Singh and MM. Thomas v. State of Kerala contending that the Courts have got power of review.
Section 362 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 203 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M.M. Thomas vs State Op Kerala And Anr on 6 January, 2000
In order to substantiate his plea, the counsel for the petitioner would refer the authorities in V.M. Shah v. State of Maharasthra , United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajendra Singh and MM. Thomas v. State of Kerala contending that the Courts have got power of review.