Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)
United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Pritpal Singh And Others on 14 January, 2014 cites

P.S. Somanathan & Ors vs District Insurance Officers & Anr on 17 February, 2011

Learned counsel for the X-objector-respondents No.1 to 4 has argued that the compensation is grossly inadequate as the multiplier of 17 has to be applied instead of 15 according to the age of the deceased. He has Sharma Ashish 2014.02.13 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh X-objections No.14-CII of 2009 in/and FAO No.3640 of 2008 -2- further argued that in Sarla Verma v. DTC (2001) 6 SCC 121, P.S.Somanathan and others v. District Insurance Officer and another (2011) 3 SCC 566 and Amrit Bhanu Shali and others v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and others 2012 ACJ 2002; the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that only the age of the deceased should be kept into consideration while fixing the multiplier.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 164 - Full Document

Amrit Bhanu Shali & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 4 April, 2012

Learned counsel for the X-objector-respondents No.1 to 4 has argued that the compensation is grossly inadequate as the multiplier of 17 has to be applied instead of 15 according to the age of the deceased. He has Sharma Ashish 2014.02.13 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh X-objections No.14-CII of 2009 in/and FAO No.3640 of 2008 -2- further argued that in Sarla Verma v. DTC (2001) 6 SCC 121, P.S.Somanathan and others v. District Insurance Officer and another (2011) 3 SCC 566 and Amrit Bhanu Shali and others v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and others 2012 ACJ 2002; the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that only the age of the deceased should be kept into consideration while fixing the multiplier.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 920 - Full Document

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... vs Trilok Chandra & Others on 7 May, 1996

Learned counsel for the appellant has countered by relying upon the judgments in U.P. State Transport Corportation and others v. Trilok Chandra and others (1996) 4 SCC 362, Ramesh Singla and others v. Satbir Singh and another 2008 (1) SCC 667 and Shakti Devi v. New India Insurance Company Ltd. and another 2010 (14) SCC 575, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down a different provision by stating that the multiplier should be applied after taking into the consideration the age of the claimants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1415 - Full Document

Shakti Devi vs New India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 9 November, 2010

Learned counsel for the appellant has countered by relying upon the judgments in U.P. State Transport Corportation and others v. Trilok Chandra and others (1996) 4 SCC 362, Ramesh Singla and others v. Satbir Singh and another 2008 (1) SCC 667 and Shakti Devi v. New India Insurance Company Ltd. and another 2010 (14) SCC 575, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down a different provision by stating that the multiplier should be applied after taking into the consideration the age of the claimants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 272 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1