Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)Section 124A in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
The Railways Act, 1989
Union Of India & Ors vs Sunil Kumar Sarkar on 28 February, 2001
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in that
case considered the identical expression
accident to a train in Section 82-A of the
Railways Act, 1890 which corresponds to the
pre-amended Section 124 of the Railways
Section 123 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Union Of India And Ors vs Sunil Kumar Ghosh on 21 August, 1984
India vs. Sunil Kumar Ghosh) to contend that the word
'accident' under Section 82-A which correspondence to
Section 124 of the Act should be understood as defined
therein. The learned Counsel has relied on para 13 of
the judgment, which reads thus:
Indian Railways Act, 1890.
State Bank Of India vs Raj Kishore Prusti on 8 January, 2008
In a decision reported in AIR 2009 Orissa 68 (in
the case of Union of India Vs. Ahalyua Prusti), the High
Court of Orissa has held in paragraphs 4 to 14 as
hereunder:
Smt Jayalakshmi vs Union Of India on 14 July, 2009
In a Division Bench judgment of Kerala High
Court reported in 2011 (2) KLT 1001 (in the case of
Jayalakshmi Vs. Union of India) it is held at paragraphs
11 and 12:
1