Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
The Management vs K.Mehanathan (Died) on 26 August, 2025 cites

Divisional Controller,Ksrtc (Nwkrtc) vs A.T. Mane on 27 September, 2004

In such 10/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/08/2025 06:20:37 pm ) W.P(MD).Nos.26173 of 2019 & 21708 of 2021 circumstances, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the management, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2005) 3 SCC 254 (Divisional Controller, KSRTC (NWKRTC) Vs. A.T.Mane), the only punishment that could be imposed upon the delinquent against whom the charges of misappropriation have been proved, is that of the dismissal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 213 - Full Document

M.Kanniyappan vs The Presiding Officer on 15 November, 2016

He also relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A(MD).No.278 of 2013 (M.Kanniyappan Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tiruchirappalli and another) to contend that when the Conductor has put in long years of service and attained the age of superannuation, when a lesser punishment is imposed by the Labour Court in exercising of its discretionary power, the 7/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/08/2025 06:20:37 pm ) W.P(MD).Nos.26173 of 2019 & 21708 of 2021 same shall not be interfered with. He had further pointed out that the delinquent has passed away on 20.06.2022 . In such circumstances, the award of the Labour Court in setting aside the punishment of dismissal may not be interfered with and the entire monetary benefits including the backwages may be directed to be released.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - V M Velumani - Full Document
1