Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Prem Bahadur And Anr. vs State on 9 August, 1996 cites

Jainul Haque vs State Of Bihar on 15 October, 1973

(13) Ms. Neelam Grover, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellants Om Prakash and Inderpal, in addition urged that her clients had been roped in on the basis of Section 34, Indian Penal Code (because neither of them gave the knife blows to Ganga Sahai). No case for invoking of that Section is made out according to her specially in view of the fact that the two appellants were not involved in the incident of the morning and they were residing in a different street though in the same locality. It is submitted that there could be no basis for forming a common intention to kill Ganga Sahai by them along with Prem Bahadur. Further, according to her at best exhortation to kill Ganga Sahai is imputed to her clients. Exhortation, according to her, is a weak piece of evidence and should not be made the sole basis of implicating the appellants. She relied on Jainul Haque v .State of Bihar, 1974 Scc (Crl) I in this behalf.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 70 - Full Document
1