Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.45 seconds)Man Mohan Das vs Janki Prasad on 17 October, 1944
"In England as well as in India in the case of co-trustees the
office is a joint one. Where the administration of the trust is
vested in co-trustees, they all form as it were but one
collective trustee, and therefore must execute the duties of
the office in their joint capacity. It is not uncommon to hear
one of several trustees spoken of as the acting trustee but the
Court knows no such distinction; all who accept the office
are in the eyes of the law acting trustees. If any one refuse or
20
be incapable to join, it is not competent for the others to
proceed without him, but the administration of the trust
must in that case devolve upon the Court. The act of one
trustee done, with the sanction and approval of a co-trustee
may be regarded as the act of both. But such sanction or
approval must be strictly proved."
Section 34 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 48 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
L. Janakirama Iyer And Others vs P. M. Nilakanta Iyer And Others on 26 October, 1961
In the judgment titled as "L. Janakirama Iyer and
others Vs. P.M. Nilakanta Iyer and others, AIR 1962 Supreme
Court 633 (V 49 C 95)" it has been held that "In the eyes of co-
trustees, the office is a joint one and under S. 48 all acts
which the trustees intend to take for executing the trust must
be taken by all of them acting together. If one of the trustees
refuses to join in the execution of the trust, S.34 provides for
the remedy. The other trustees can apply to the court as
contemplated by S. 34 and the trust may accordingly be
executed. But S. 48 also contemplates that if a trust deed
under which more trustees than one are appointed expressly
provides that the execution of the trust may be carried out
not by all but by one or more then of course the matter
would be governed by the special provision of the trust
deed."
Pushpa Rani And Ors. vs Bhagwanti Devi And Anr. on 7 September, 1993
(ii) Pushpa Rani Vs. Bhagwanti Devi, AIR 1994 SC 774.
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani & Anr vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors on 6 December, 2004
(ii) Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and another Vs. Indusind
Bank Ltd and others, AIR 2005 Supreme Court 439.
Udhoo Dass vs Prem Prakash And Anr. on 6 February, 1963
(ii) Udhoo Dass Vs. Prem Prakash & another, AIR 1964
Allahabad 1 (V 51 C 1).
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Tejoomal Lakhmichand vs M.J. Talegaonkar And Ors. on 4 February, 1980
In support of the said contention, the Ld. counsel for
the appellants relied upon the judgment Tejoomal
Lakhmichand Vs. M.J. Talegaonkar & others, AIR 1980
Bombay 369.