Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.29 seconds)The Wakf Act, 1995
Section 55 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 54 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 83 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 116 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Thomas Cook (India) Limited vs Hotel Imperial And Ors. on 9 January, 2006
"28. The expressions 'due process of law', 'due course of law'
and 'recourse to law' have been interchangeably used in the
decisions referred to above which say that the settled possession
of even a person in unlawful possession cannot be disturbed
'forcibly' by the true owner taking law in his own hands. All
these expressions, however, mean the same thing - ejectment
from settled possession can only be had by recourse to a court
of law. Clearly, 'due process of law' or 'due course of law', here,
simply mean that a person in settled possession cannot be
ejected without a court of law having adjudicated upon his
rights qua the true owner.