Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.26 seconds)

Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M.P.V. & Engg. Industries on 11 March, 2003

In the light of the view expressed by the Apex Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.P.V. & Engineering Industries (supra) and also in the light of the view expressed by the learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1954 of 2005 dated 30-6-2006 Sukhjit Starch Mills Limited's case (supra), which is latter in point of time wherein reliance was placed on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in P.P.R. Industries v. Commissioner of Industries (supra), this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners are entitled to the incentives or benefits as per G.O. Ms. No. 333 dated 14-11-2003 and G.O. Ms. No. 55 dated 5-3-2004 till the date of issuance G.O. Ms. No. 179 from the respective dates of the applications dated 29-5-2004, 24-4-2004 and 6-5-2004 respectively.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 20 - B P Singh - Full Document

P.P.P. Industries vs Commissioner Of Industries And Anr. on 13 August, 1993

In the light of the view expressed by the Apex Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.P.V. & Engineering Industries (supra) and also in the light of the view expressed by the learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1954 of 2005 dated 30-6-2006 Sukhjit Starch Mills Limited's case (supra), which is latter in point of time wherein reliance was placed on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in P.P.R. Industries v. Commissioner of Industries (supra), this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners are entitled to the incentives or benefits as per G.O. Ms. No. 333 dated 14-11-2003 and G.O. Ms. No. 55 dated 5-3-2004 till the date of issuance G.O. Ms. No. 179 from the respective dates of the applications dated 29-5-2004, 24-4-2004 and 6-5-2004 respectively.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Punjab Communications Ltd vs Union Of India & Others on 4 May, 1999

17. Strong reliance was placed on the decision of the learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 3506 of 2006 dated 24th day of February, 2006 Venus Food Products's case (supra), whereunder the learned Judge after referring to Punjab Communication Limited v. Union of India , and also in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products , in relation to both legitimate expectation and also principle of promissory estoppel and arrived at a conclusion that the writ petitioner has not placed before the Court any assurance specifically given to the petitioner or the orders of the fourth respondent giving eligibility certificate as required under G.O. Ms. No. 333, dated 14.11.2003 and therefore, the petitioner cannot be heard to say that it has altered its position to the detriment and the writ petition is devoid of any merit and accordingly dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 277 - M J Rao - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.Etc vs Ganesh Wood Products & Ors.Etc on 11 September, 1995

17. Strong reliance was placed on the decision of the learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 3506 of 2006 dated 24th day of February, 2006 Venus Food Products's case (supra), whereunder the learned Judge after referring to Punjab Communication Limited v. Union of India , and also in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products , in relation to both legitimate expectation and also principle of promissory estoppel and arrived at a conclusion that the writ petitioner has not placed before the Court any assurance specifically given to the petitioner or the orders of the fourth respondent giving eligibility certificate as required under G.O. Ms. No. 333, dated 14.11.2003 and therefore, the petitioner cannot be heard to say that it has altered its position to the detriment and the writ petition is devoid of any merit and accordingly dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 160 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs M/S. Indo-Afghan Agencies Ltd on 22 November, 1967

It is too late in the day now to urge that the petitioners are not entitled to claim relief on the basis of equitable estoppel. A catena of decisions of the Supreme Court from Union of India v. Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718, Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Council , Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. , Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 1496, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of UP. , Sri Bakul Oil Industries v. State of Gujarat , Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana .
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 398 - J C Shah - Full Document

Century Spinning & Manufacturing ... vs The Ulhasnagar- Municipal Council And ... on 27 February, 1970

It is too late in the day now to urge that the petitioners are not entitled to claim relief on the basis of equitable estoppel. A catena of decisions of the Supreme Court from Union of India v. Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718, Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Council , Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. , Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 1496, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of UP. , Sri Bakul Oil Industries v. State of Gujarat , Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana .
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 236 - J C Shah - Full Document

Turner Morrison And Co., Ltd vs Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd on 9 March, 1972

It is too late in the day now to urge that the petitioners are not entitled to claim relief on the basis of equitable estoppel. A catena of decisions of the Supreme Court from Union of India v. Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718, Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Council , Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. , Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 1496, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of UP. , Sri Bakul Oil Industries v. State of Gujarat , Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana .
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 61 - K S Hegde - Full Document

M/S Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 12 December, 1978

In the light of the view expressed by the Apex Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.P.V. & Engineering Industries (supra) and also in the light of the view expressed by the learned Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1954 of 2005 dated 30-6-2006 Sukhjit Starch Mills Limited's case (supra), which is latter in point of time wherein reliance was placed on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in P.P.R. Industries v. Commissioner of Industries (supra), this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners are entitled to the incentives or benefits as per G.O. Ms. No. 333 dated 14-11-2003 and G.O. Ms. No. 55 dated 5-3-2004 till the date of issuance G.O. Ms. No. 179 from the respective dates of the applications dated 29-5-2004, 24-4-2004 and 6-5-2004 respectively.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1143 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Bakul Oil Industries & Anr vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 11 November, 1986

It is too late in the day now to urge that the petitioners are not entitled to claim relief on the basis of equitable estoppel. A catena of decisions of the Supreme Court from Union of India v. Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718, Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Council , Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. , Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 1496, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of UP. , Sri Bakul Oil Industries v. State of Gujarat , Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana .
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 99 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Bhim Singh vs State Of Haryana on 11 December, 2002

It is too late in the day now to urge that the petitioners are not entitled to claim relief on the basis of equitable estoppel. A catena of decisions of the Supreme Court from Union of India v. Afghan Agencies AIR 1968 SC 718, Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Council , Turner Morrison and Co. Ltd v. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. , Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 1496, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of UP. , Sri Bakul Oil Industries v. State of Gujarat , Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana .
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 129 - Full Document
1   2 Next