Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.27 seconds)

Commr.Of Income Tax vs M/S Alom Extructions Limited on 25 November, 2009

12. We are of the view that the reasoning of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd(supra) will equally to the amendment to Sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act whereby a second proviso was inserted in sub-clause (ia) of clause (a) of Section 40 by the Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 1-4-2013. The provisions are intended to remove hardship. It was argued on behalf of the revenue that the existing provisions allow deduction in the year of payment and to that extent there is no hardship. We are of the view that the hardship in such an event would be taxing an Assessee on a higher income in one year and taxing him on lower income in a subsequent year. To the extent the Assessee is made to pay tax on a higher income in one year, there would still be hardship.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 1142 - S H Kapadia - Full Document
1   2 Next