Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.36 seconds)
The New India Insu.Co.Divisional ... vs Smt.Rani Yadv on 16 March, 2020 cites

Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Smt Sujatha W/O H D Parashurama on 27 August, 2010

9. Apex Court in the case of North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs Sujatha (2019) 11 SCC also following the above mentioned judgement held that the interest should be paid from the date of accident. So, in the light of the above mentioned decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court the legal position is clear that the liability to pay compensation arises on the date of accident and when it is not paid within the statutory period of 30 days, then the liability to pay interest commences, after the expiry of 30 days from the date of accident. So the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation did not commit any mistake in awarding the interest from the date of incident.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 264 - B S Gowda - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004

In this regard, the Apex court in the case of Pappu v. Vinod Kumar Lamba, (2018) 3 SCC 208 following the earlier judgement of Apex Court passed in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh, (2004) 3 SCC 297 reiterated "the defences available to the insurance company under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Insurance Company is entitled to take a defence that the offending vehicle was driven by an unauthorised person or the person driving the vehicle did not have a valid driving licence. The onus would shift on the Insurance Digitally signed by ANURAG SONI Date: 17/03/2020 10:56:58 7 Company only after the owner of the offending vehicle pleads and proves the basic facts within his knowledge that the driver of the offending vehicle was authorised by him to drive the vehicle and was having a valid driving licence at the relevant time.''
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 3847 - Full Document
1