Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.36 seconds)Sudarsan Das vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 26 March, 1991
(ii) Even dredging and desilting must be done strictly in
accordance with the guidelines provided by the Central
Government through MoEF&CC in Sustainable Sand
Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 and Enforcement
Page 37 of 40
and Monitoring Guidelines of Sand Mining, 2020 and as
per the directions issued by the Principal Bench of
National Green Tribunal in Original Application No.
186 of 2016 (Satendra Pandey Vs. Ministry of
Environment, Forest and Climate Change), O.A.
173/2018 (Sudarsan Das Vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) and Original Application No.
360/2015 (National Green Tribunal Bar
Association Vs. Virender Singh, State of Gujarat)
and this Bench in Original Application No.252 of
2017 (SZ) [Udaya Suvarna Vs. The Deputy
Commissioner/Chairman, Udupi District Sand
Monitoring Committee and Ors.].
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Dr. Sarvabhoum Bagali vs State Of Karnataka Through Its Director ... on 11 May, 2022
1.0 PREAMBLE
In the Original Application No. 144 of 2020 (SZ), filed by
Dr.Sarvabhoum Bagali, Vs The State of Karnataka &Ors, the Hon‟ble
National Green Tribunal (NGT), Chennai vide Order dated 07.08.2020
constituted a Joint Committee to inspect the sites in question and
submit a Report. Accordingly, the Joint Committee has inspected the
sand mines at Raichur District and submitted a report on 21.12.2020.
Hon‟ble NGT vide order dated 09.11.2021 issued following directions:
Karnataka Lake Conservation and Development Authority Act, 2014
Deepak Kumar Etc vs State Of Haryana & Ors.Etc on 27 February, 2012
12. It is further contended that the project/activities which do not
fall under the ambit of exemption as specified in the above mentioned
notification shall be governed by the provisions of EIA Notification,
2006 and its subsequent amendment from time to time and the latest
amended copy of the notification vide S.O. 1224 (E) dated
28.03.2020 was produced as Annexure - R2 (2). The EIA Notification
dated 15.01.2016 was challenged before the Principal Bench of
National Green Tribunal, New Delhi by filing Original Application No.
186 of 2016 titled as Satendra Pandey Vs. Ministry of Environment,
Forest and Climate Change and the Tribunal in Para (25) of the order
dated 13.09.2018, directed as follows, "The MoEF&CC shall,
therefore, take appropriate steps to revise the procedure laid down in
the impugned Notification dated 15.01.2016 in terms of the above
directions and observations so that it is conformity with the letter and
spirit of the directions passed by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in
Deepak Kumar (supra)", evidenced by Annexure - R2 (3), Order of
the National Green Tribunal. Subsequently, the MoEF&CC had issued
Office Memorandum in tune with the directions issued by the Principal
Bench of National Green Tribunal, abolishing the DEIAA and directing
the SIEAA to consider all the applications which are pending with the
DEIAA at that time, evidenced by Annexure R2(4).
Section 3 in The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Indian Forest Act, 1927
Vikrant Tonad vs Union Of India on 19 June, 2020
The Principal
Bench of National Green Tribunal in Execution Application No. 55 of
2018 in Original Application No. 520 of 2016 (Vikrant Tongad Vs.
Union of India) dated 11.12.2018 passed the following order
"6. ....The direction that 15.01.2016 should still be acted upon is
clearly illegal and in violation of judgment of this Tribunal. The same will
stand suspended till a fresh Notification is issued by the MoEF&CC as
directed hereinabove.