Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.26 seconds)Madhusudan Das vs Smt. Narayanibai (Deceased) By Lrs. And ... on 25 November, 1982
b) Madhuaudan Das v. Narayanibai - where the findings of fact by the trial court are mainly based on oral evidence, Page 0253 the first appellate court ought not to disturb the same unless the trial court's approach in appraisal of evidence appears materially erroneous.
Gorantla Thataiah vs Thotakura Venkata Subbaiah & Ors on 19 March, 1968
c) Gorantla Thatcdah v. Thotakura Venkata Subbaiah - wherein it is held that it is well established that in a case in which a Will is prepared under circumstances which raise the suspicion of the court that it does not express the mind of the testator it is for those who propound the Will to remove that suspicion. What are suspicious circumstances must be judged in the facts and circumstances of each particular case. If however, the propounder takes a prominent part in the execution of the Will which confers substantial benefit on him that itself is a suspicious circumstance, attending the execution of the Will and in appreciating the evidence in such a case, the court should proceed in a vigilant and cautious manner.
Section 59 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Indian Succession Act, 1925
1