Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)

Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Upendra Singh on 17 February, 1994

Indeed, even after the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, if the matter comes to court or tribunal, they have no jurisdiction to look into the truth of the charges or into the correctness of the findings recorded by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority as the case may be. The function of the court/tribunal is one of judicial review, the parameters of which are repeatedly laid down by this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 426 - B P Reddy - Full Document

The Secretary, Min.Of Defence & Ors vs Prabhash Chandra Mirdha on 30 April, 2007

In the case of Secretary, Ministry of Defence and Others Vs. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha [Civil Appeal No.2333 of 2007, Decided on May 29, 2012], the Apex Court of India held that normally, a Charge sheet is not liable to be quashed as it does not adversely affect the rights of an employee and does not give rise to any cause of action. A writ lies only when some right of a party is infringed. The charge sheet does not infringe the right of a party. It is only when a final order imposing punishment or otherwise, it may have a cause of action. Hence, writ petition challenging charge sheet by itself is not maintainable. However, it can be quashed on the ground that issuing authority being not competent to issue the same.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 365 - Full Document
1