Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Amena Bibi And Others vs Sk. Abdul Haque on 20 February, 1996
(iii) Amena Bibi and Ors. vs. Sk. Abdul Haque reported in AIR 1997 Calcutta
59;
Rani Aloka Dudhoria & Ors vs Goutam Dudhoria & Ors on 5 March, 2009
4. It is thus argued that in the event the accounts commissioner's report
as submitted before the learned trial court had not been set aside with a
3
further direction to issue fresh commission after serving notice to both the
sides, the present defendant/petitioner would suffer irreparable loss and
injury. Placing his reliance upon the reported decision of Rani Aloka
Dudhoria and others vs. Gautam Dudhoria and others reported in
(2009)13 SCC 569 it is argued that in the said reported decision the
Hon'ble Apex Court made it clear that prior to holding commission, notice to
all the parties to a suit is a sine qua non. It is thus submitted that since in
the case in hand such principle of law has not been followed the instant
revisional application may be allowed by setting aside the impugned order.
Soni Dineshbhai Manilal And Others vs Jagjivan Mulchand Chokshi on 14 December, 2007
(vi) Soni Dineshbhai Manilal and Ors. vs. Jagjtvan Mulchand Chokshi reported
in (2007) 13 SCC 293.
Harihar Misra vs Narhari Setti Sitaramiah And Anr. on 2 April, 1965
(iv) Harihar Misra vs. Narhari Setti Sitaramiah and Anr. Reported in 1965 SCC
Online Ori 18: AIR 1996 Ori 121;
Roy And Co. And Anr. vs Sm. Nani Bala Dey And Ors. on 31 August, 1978
(ii) M/s Roy and Co. and Anr vs. Sm. Nani Bala Dey and Ors. reported in 1978
SCC Online Cal 235: AIR 1979 Cal 50;
1