Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)Section 451 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 18 November, 2002
In facts of the case following the law laid down in case
of General Insurance Council and others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
and others reported in (2010) 6 SCC 768 wherein the earlier principles laid
down in case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported
in (2002) 10 SCC 283 was reiterated, the order of rejection of application for
interim custody cannot be allowed to remain. Consequently, applying the
said principles, it is directed that the vehicle as well as the aforesaid mobile
phone be released in favour of the Petitioner by way of interim measure, if
the confiscation proceedings have not been concluded till date of production
of copy of this order.
Section 34 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Jyoti Pratap Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 April, 2017
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court in Cr.M.P. No.1374 of 2020 in the case of Tikeshwar
Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh decided on 11.12.2020, Cr.M.P. No.524
of 2017 in the case of Jyoti Pratap Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and
another decided on 25.04.2017 and Cr.M.P. No.562 of 2016 in case of
Sonelal Patel Vs. State of C.G. and others decided on 07.07.2016 a s well
as the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in case of Rocky Verma
(died) Thr.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
General Insurance Council & Ors vs State Of A.P.& Ors on 19 April, 2010
In facts of the case following the law laid down in case
of General Insurance Council and others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
and others reported in (2010) 6 SCC 768 wherein the earlier principles laid
down in case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported
in (2002) 10 SCC 283 was reiterated, the order of rejection of application for
interim custody cannot be allowed to remain. Consequently, applying the
said principles, it is directed that the vehicle as well as the aforesaid mobile
phone be released in favour of the Petitioner by way of interim measure, if
the confiscation proceedings have not been concluded till date of production
of copy of this order.