Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.20 seconds)Section 381 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 378 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Babu Ram Jagdish Kumar & Co., Etc., Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors., Etc., Etc on 4 May, 1979
14. Moreover, there is no evidence on the file to prove that the
alleged stolen articles belong to the complainant. The complainant also
stated in her cross-examination that she did not hand over any bills or
receipts of her gold to the IO. There is no document on the file to prove the
ownership/possession of the alleged articles in the name of the complainant.
On this score also, the accused is entitled to benefit of doubt. Reliance in this
regard can be placed on Manjinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (P&H)
2009(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 919 and Babu Vs The State of Punjab 1977
Cr CASES 91142/2016 PAGE 9 OF 15
STATE Vs. BHASKAR MALIK
FIR NO. 360/2014 (GreaterKailash) SEEMA Digitally signed by
SEEMA NIRMAL
u/s 381/411 IPC
NIRMAL Date: 2025.04.25
13:07:03 +0530
CLR 142.