Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.30 seconds)

Narsinha Anant Joshi vs Century Shipping & Ors. on 9 February, 1994

In Narsinha Anand Joshi V. Centuary Shipping, LLR 440, it was laid down that to ascertain whether an employee is a Workman, the nature of work of employee, the various duties performed by him, his status and position in the company, his ranking all clearly go to show that he was employed mainly in administrative capacity and any work which can be termed as work of clerical nature done by him was only incidental to his employment in the administrative capacity.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

G. T. Lad & Ors vs Chemicals & Fibres Of India Ltd on 6 December, 1978

In G.T. Lad & Others Vs. Chemicals and Fibres India Ltd, AIR 1979 SC 582, Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down whether there has been a voluntary abandonment of services or not is a question of fact which has to be determined in the light of surrounding circumstances of 23 each case. It was further laid down that to constitute abandonment, there must be total or complete giving up of duties so as to indicate an intention not to resume the same.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 274 - J Singh - Full Document

The Buckingham And Carnatic Co. Ltd vs Venkatiah And Anr on 2 August, 1963

In Buckingham Co. Vs. Venkatiah ( 1964) 4 SCR 265, AIR 1964 SC 1272, held that under common law an inference that an employee has abandoned or relinquished service is not easily drawn unless from the length of absence and from other surrounding circumstances, an inference to that effect can be legitimately drawn and it can be assumed that the employee intended to abandon the service. Abandonment or relinquishment of service is always a question of intention and normally, such an intention cannot be attributed to an employee without adequate evidence in that behalf. Thus, whether there has been a voluntary; abandonment of service or not is a question of fact which has to be determined in the light of the surrounding circumstances of each case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 182 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1