Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.63 seconds)Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979
In R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India, , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows:
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
West Coast Employers' Federation, ... vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The ... on 6 March, 1967
In Scots law, by contrast, the distinction between public and private law is rejected and the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Session is available wherever a decision-making power is conferred on some body, whether by statute or private contract or some other instrument, [6 (Emphasis is put upon the 'tripartite relationship' between the body conferring the jurisdiction, the body exercising it and the citizen affected by it. But this may not be an inflexible requirement: Naik v. University of Stirling 1994 SLT 449; Jobeen v. University of Stirling 1995 SLT 120] and that body exceeds or abuses its power or fails in its duty [7 (West v. Secretary of State for Scotland 1992 SLT 636, where the law is fully expounded by Lord President Hope. Grounds of review are held to be the same as in England but procedure is different and problem-free: see below, p. 651.
U.P. State Co-Operative Land ... vs Chandra Bhan Dubey And Ors on 18 December, 1998
In my view since I am not considering the issue whether BCCI is State/instrumentality of State/Authority under Article 12, I am not required to consider the impact and effect of most of the other judgments relied upon by the counsel except U.P. State Co-operative Land Development Bank's case (supra). I am also not considering this question as to whether BCCI is State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India as the decision of the Karnataka High Court rejecting the preliminary objection of the Karnataka State Cricket Association, which is an affiliate of BCCI, that it was not 'State' amenable to writ jurisdiction, already stands stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by its order dated 23rd July 2001. The order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 23rd 2001 reads as follows:
Air India Statutory Corporation vs United Labour Union & Ors on 6 November, 1996
21. It is because the above reason, the Supreme Court, after reviewing those of the judgments on the issue at hand, in the case of AIR INDIA STATUtorY CORPORATION V. UNITED LABOUR UNION has held that:-