Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)

Association Of Registration Plates vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 November, 2004

Mr.Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2912/2011, invited my attention to the RTI Act and submitted that while providing information is the rule under the Act, but at the same time, there are several exceptions. Thus, the right to information guaranteed by the statute is subject to certain provisions which provide for exemptions from disclosure. Inviting my attention to Sections 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, Mr.Manohar submits that the information, disclosure of which, leads to incitement of an offence or the information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, should not be given, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information. Criticizing the order passed by the Respondent No.1, Mr.Manohar submits that the Respondent No.1 committed a serious error in law while passing the impugned order. Mr.Manohar submits that the Honourable Supreme Court of India in the decision reported in (2005) 1 SCC 679 (Association of Registration Plates v/s Union of India and others), had issued directives that the registration of motor vehicles should be ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 17:25:44 ::: *7* wp.2912.3137.11.sxw safety oriented and there should not be any scope for unscrupulous and criminal elements to tamper with registration of the motor vehicles.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 208 - Full Document
1   2 Next