Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (1.27 seconds)Section 7 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 144A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
S. Govinda Menon vs The Union Of India & Anr on 2 February, 1967
So far as the delay is concerned, it is
contended in the written arguments that the issue in
question related to the year 2009 whereas the charge
' sheet was issued to the applicant in the year 2015 after
a delay of six years. They contend that if the charge
against the delinquent is one of corruption, mere delay
should not | be a ground for interference in
departmental proceedings and quashing thereof The.
gravity and magnitude of the charge will go. to the root |
of the matter, and therefore, charge sheet cannot be
quashed. For this purpose, he has placed reliance on
the case of S.Govinda Menon vs. Union of India and
another, AIR 1967 SC 1274 and the case of Anand R.
Kulkarni vs. Y.P.Education Society and others,
(2013) 6 SCC 515, | |
: 12. We have thoughtfully considered the submissions
made in the arguments by learned counsel for both the ~
parties.
Anant R Kulkarni vs Y.P.Education Society & Ors on 26 April, 2013
So far as the delay is concerned, it is
contended in the written arguments that the issue in
question related to the year 2009 whereas the charge
' sheet was issued to the applicant in the year 2015 after
a delay of six years. They contend that if the charge
against the delinquent is one of corruption, mere delay
should not | be a ground for interference in
departmental proceedings and quashing thereof The.
gravity and magnitude of the charge will go. to the root |
of the matter, and therefore, charge sheet cannot be
quashed. For this purpose, he has placed reliance on
the case of S.Govinda Menon vs. Union of India and
another, AIR 1967 SC 1274 and the case of Anand R.
Kulkarni vs. Y.P.Education Society and others,
(2013) 6 SCC 515, | |
: 12. We have thoughtfully considered the submissions
made in the arguments by learned counsel for both the ~
parties.
Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar vs U.O.I. And Others on 6 August, 1999
In paras 41, 42 and 43 of the case of Zunjarrao
_ Bhikaji Nagarkar (supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court
observed thus: