Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)

Shri Guru Gobind Singh Foundation, Moga vs Dcit, C-1 (E), Chandigarh on 29 March, 2019

"5. The facts of the case and the grounds raised by the appellant have been considered carefully. There is a substantial delay in the filing of appeal for which no sufficient reason was given by the appellant. The appellant has failed to justify the in ordinate delay in filing appeal. From the factual position which emerges it appears that a conscious and considered decision was taken by the assessee at the relevant point of time for not filing of appeal against the impugned order. It is well-settled law that a distinction must be I.T.A No. 610/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2021-22 Page No 3 Shri Govind Guru University vs. DCIT made between a case where the delay is inordinate and where the delay is of few days only. The inordinate delay in the instant case clearly demonstrates that this appeal was not prosecuted with due care.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Vedabai @ Vaijayanatabai Baburao Patil vs Shantaram Baburao Patil And Ors on 20 July, 2001

On the issue of a routine delay and an inordinate delay, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vedabhai alias Vaijayantabai Baburao Patil vs. Shantaram Baburao Patil [2002] reported in 122 Taxman 114, has made a distinction between delays that are trivial and cases where inordinately large delays had occurred. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that the cases of trivial delays have to be liberally considered, however the cases of inordinate delays have to be approached cautiously. The relevant portion of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is reproduced as under.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 655 - Full Document
1