Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)
Chief Executive Officer And ... vs Patel Gandu Paba (Decd.) Through Lrs. ... on 18 April, 1998 cites

C E Or & Vice Chairman, Gujarat Maritime ... vs Shri Haji Daud Haji Harun Abuand Two ... on 20 November, 1996

6. I have heard Mr. Gusain. At the outset, to shorten the controversy, it is made clear by Mr. Gusain that he does not claim any legal right of audience or right of practice as he has not enrolled himself as an Advocate. His only say is that by virtue of his designation as Dy. Collector-cum-Sr. Legal Advisor in the GMB, he has been authorised by the Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer, GMB to appear and represent GMB in particular cases only. He has been filing appearance in various Courts on behalf of GMB and has argued the matter only with prior permission of the concerned Court or authority or person in that particular case as provided under Section 32 of the Advocates Act, 1961. He has also furnished a list of cases shown at Annexure 'A' wherein he has put in appearance and he has been given audience by various Courts right from the Supreme Court, down below to the Court of Civil Judge (JD). He has also referred to one of the decisions of the Apex Court in the case of Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman, Gujarat Maritime Board v. Haji Daud Haji Harun Abu, reported in (1996) 11 SCC 23 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India granted audience on the basis of merely a memorandum of authority and the memo of appearance. The sample of the authority letter and the memo of appearance filed by Mr. Gusain in different Courts is reproduced as follows :
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 37 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next