Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.21 seconds)

Natraj Studios (P) Ltd vs Navrang Studios & Anr on 7 January, 1981

XX XX XX There are, however, two other aspects which are relevant to find out whether the ratio of Natraj Studios' case (supra) should be extended to the present appeals. As already stated, these appeals do not relate to eviction. The tenancy in the instant case had terminated about a year before the awards were delivered. There was, therefore, no existing tenancy. Sections 4 and 5 of the Orissa House Kent Control Act are complementary provisions. Section 4 gets attracted when an application Under Section 5 of the Act is possible to be made.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 183 - O C Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next